United States v. Pizarro-Berrios

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that substantive due process claim requires plaintiff to prove “both that the acts were so egregious as to shock the conscience and that they deprived him of a protected interest in life, liberty, or property”
• noting that \the fact that [defendant] was in jail does not in and of itself mean that he withdrew from the scheme\
• finding the loss amount in a bank fraud scheme foreseeable to the defendant who was involved with the scheme from the beginning, knew the leaders of the scheme, and knew the details of the scheme
• “[E]xcept in extraordinary circumstances, arguments not raised in a party’s initial brief and instead raised for the first time at oral argument are considered waived.”
• \[A]rguments not raised in a party's initial brief and instead raised for the first time at oral argument are considered waived.\
• “[E]xcept in extraordinary circumstances, arguments not raised in a party’s initial brief and instead raised for the first time at oral argument are considered waived.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).