Skip to main content
First Circuit· 2/22/2010

United States v. Mitchell

Citations

  • 596 F.3d 18
  • 81 Fed. R. Serv. 644
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 3573
  • 2010 WL 598674

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \It is without question that the `suspension of a driver's license for statutorily defined cause implicates a protectible property interest.' Mackey v. Montrym
  • stating that the Court resolved doubt in the interpretation of an immigration statute in favor of the alien \because deportation is a drastic measure and at times the equivalent of banishment or exile” (quoting Fong Haw Tan v. Phelan
  • \Prisoners are entitled to administrative review of the computation of their credits
  • \[F]or the purposes of filing amendments
  • \[F]or the purposes of filing amendments
  • rejecting the argument that a buyer-seller instruction was required because “the evidence at trial showed that Mitchell was involved in multiple trans- actions, for large, kilogram-quantities of cocaine, for large sums of money”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Souter, Stahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.