First Circuit· 2/22/2010
United States v. Mitchell
Citations
- 596 F.3d 18
- 81 Fed. R. Serv. 644
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 3573
- 2010 WL 598674
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \It is without question that the `suspension of a driver's license for statutorily defined cause implicates a protectible property interest.' Mackey v. Montrym
- stating that the Court resolved doubt in the interpretation of an immigration statute in favor of the alien \because deportation is a drastic measure and at times the equivalent of banishment or exile” (quoting Fong Haw Tan v. Phelan
- \Prisoners are entitled to administrative review of the computation of their credits
- \[F]or the purposes of filing amendments
- \[F]or the purposes of filing amendments
- rejecting the argument that a buyer-seller instruction was required because “the evidence at trial showed that Mitchell was involved in multiple trans- actions, for large, kilogram-quantities of cocaine, for large sums of money”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torruella, Souter, Stahl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. CiresiFirst Circuit· 2012-10-05· cited 79×
- United States v. Royel PageSeventh Circuit· 2024-12-18· cited 46×
- United States v. Diaz AriasFirst Circuit· 2013-04-29· cited 42×
- United States v. CelestinFirst Circuit· 2010-07-14· cited 34×
- United States v. FoggFirst Circuit· 2011-12-01· cited 33×
- United States v. FordFirst Circuit· 2016-10-14· cited 18×
- United States v. RazoFirst Circuit· 2015-04-01· cited 12×
- United States v. PenaFirst Circuit· 2022-01-21· cited 11×
- United States v. RodriguezFirst Circuit· 2014-07-16· cited 10×
- United States v. Martinez-AlbertoFirst Circuit· 2023-08-21· cited 6×
- United States v. RuizFirst Circuit· 2021-06-04· cited 5×
- United States v. Rodríguez-RodríguezFirst Circuit· 2011-12-13· cited 4×
- United States v. Rodriguez-RodriguezFirst Circuit· 2011-12-13· cited 3×
- United States v. DimasiD. Massachusetts· 2011-08-30· cited 1×
- United States v. RojasFirst Circuit· 2014-07-07· cited 1×
- United States v. WrightDistrict of Columbia· 2018-01-22
- United States v. Rosario-OrangelFirst Circuit· 2026-03-20
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. DuarteFirst Circuit· 2001-04-23· cited 452×
- United States v. Ralph PetrozzielloFirst Circuit· 1977-01-21· cited 328×
- United States v. InnamoratiFirst Circuit· 1993-06-17· cited 225×
- United States v. CiampagliaFirst Circuit· 1980-08-04· cited 153×
- United States v. VaroudakisFirst Circuit· 2000-12-06· cited 148×
- United States v. AndujarFirst Circuit· 1995-03-06· cited 129×
- United States v. Felix RodriguezFirst Circuit· 1988-10-07· cited 128×
- United States v. Rafael Portela, United States of America v. Francisco Villaman-Rodrguez, United States of America v. Juan A. CarrasquilloFirst Circuit· 1999-03-22· cited 116×
- United States v. George A. MoranFirst Circuit· 1993-01-20· cited 103×
- United States v. PiperFirst Circuit· 2002-07-26· cited 98×
- United States v. HawkinsSecond Circuit· 2008-10-16· cited 96×
- United States v. Ulice AskewSeventh Circuit· 2005-04-05· cited 93×
- United States v. BradshawFirst Circuit· 2002-02-25· cited 90×
- United States v. GomezFirst Circuit· 2001-07-06· cited 72×
- United States v. Montel Lavelle HumphreySixth Circuit· 2002-04-17· cited 72×
- United States v. Morales-MaderaFirst Circuit· 2003-11-20· cited 63×
- United States v. Femi JohnsonSeventh Circuit· 2006-02-10· cited 59×
- United States v. Alberto Tejada, United States of America v. Juan Ignacio Diaz, United States of America v. Geovanne GomezFirst Circuit· 1989-10-04· cited 49×
- United States v. Candelaria-SilvaFirst Circuit· 1998-12-11· cited 48×
- United States v. Martínez-MedinaFirst Circuit· 2002-02-08· cited 46×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.