Skip to main content
· 11/18/1993

People of the Territory of Guam v. Anthony Camacho Ignacio

Citations

  • 10 F.3d 608
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8509
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 14575
  • 39 Fed. R. Serv. 1354
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 29841

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • failing to reach whether present sense impression exception is firmly rooted because statement had particularized guarantees of trustworthiness
  • holding the “record does not show that the statement to the social worker was for medical treatment” because the social worker testified that “he questioned the child to determine whether he needed to notify Child Protective Services of a case of suspected child abuse.”
  • finding a child abuse victim’s report of a molestation “later that day” 26 admissible under the excited utterance exception because the molestation was “likely 27 extremely traumatic” and “we can assume that the child still would have been under the 28 stress of it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson, Norris, Tanner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.