Sixth Circuit· 11/23/2009

United States v. Petrus

Citations

588 F.3d 347
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 25597
2009 WL 4016475

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that, dependent upon the circumstances of the case, a defendant's deportability could be viewed as either a mitigating or an aggravating factor
holding that, dependent upon the circumstances of the case, a defendant's deportability could be viewed as either a mitigating or an aggravating factor
acknowledging that sentencing court may consider defendant's \potential deportation\ and \immigration - 12 - status\
holding that “‘a district court’s failure to address each argument [of the defendant] head-on will not lead to automatic vacatur’ if the context and record make the court’s reasoning clear” (quoting United States v. Smith, 505 F.3d 463, 468 (6th Cir. 2007))
acknowledging that the district court “addressed every position advanced by the Defendant”
acknowledging that the district court \addressed every position advanced by the Defendant\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gilman, McKeague, Sargus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Petrus

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.