United States v. Petrus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, dependent upon the circumstances of the case, a defendant's deportability could be viewed as either a mitigating or an aggravating factor
• holding that, dependent upon the circumstances of the case, a defendant's deportability could be viewed as either a mitigating or an aggravating factor
• acknowledging that sentencing court may consider defendant's \potential deportation\ and \immigration - 12 - status\
• holding that “‘a district court’s failure to address each argument [of the defendant] head-on will not lead to automatic vacatur’ if the context and record make the court’s reasoning clear” (quoting United States v. Smith, 505 F.3d 463, 468 (6th Cir. 2007))
• acknowledging that the district court “addressed every position advanced by the Defendant”
• acknowledging that the district court \addressed every position advanced by the Defendant\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named United States v. Petrus

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• United States v. Petrus
  Fifth Circuit· 1986-07-23
• United States v. Petrus
  Fifth Circuit· 1988-12-01
• United States v. Petrus
  Fifth Circuit· 1994-12-27
• United States v. Petrus
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-03-19
• United States v. Petrus
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-09-15