United States v. Michael E. Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the sentencing court’s failure to provide an adequate of its reasons for imposing a chosen sentence “renders our reasonableness review impossible”
• reaffirming that “we as an appellate court must still have the articulation of the reasons the district court reached the sentence ultimately imposed.”
• reaffirming that “we as an appellate court must still have the articulation of the reasons the district court reached the sentence ultimately imposed”
• reaffirming that “we as an appellate court must still have the articulation of the reasons the district court reached the sentence ultimately imposed”
• explaining that the sentencing court’s failure to provide an adequate explanation of its reasons for imposing a chosen sentence “renders our reasonableness review impossible”
• explaining that the sentencing court’s failure to provide an adequate of its reasons for imposing a chosen sentence “renders our reasonableness review impossible”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).