United States v. Lapsins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the government’s refusal to move for the a third-level reduction was not arbitrary or unconstitutional where the defendant filed numerous objections to the PSR recanting previous statements
• noting that \the record reveals that the district judge considered [Defendant's] arguments and evidence in support of a downward variance\
• noting that “the record reveals that the district judge considered [Defendant’s] arguments and evidence in support of a downward variance”
• holding a district court “is not required to give the reasons for rejecting any and all arguments” made regarding sentencing.
• confirming that sentences imposed within the properly calculated Guidelines range carry a rebuttable presumption of substantiative reasonableness
• noting that “the record reveals that the district judge considered [Defendant’s] arguments and evidence in support of a downward variance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).