United States v. Lalonde

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that, post-plea, a petitioner “may only attack the voluntary and intelligent character of the guilty plea”
• recognizing that after pleading guilty, a defendant “may only attack the voluntary and intelligent character of the guilty plea” (quotations omitted)
• noting that after Gall, a court of appeals “cannot find that a sentencing court has properly considered the § 3553(a) factors if it miscalculated the advisory Guidelines range”
• noting that after Gall, a court of appeals “cannot find that a sentencing court has properly considered the § 3553(a) factors if it miscalculated the advisory Guidelines range”
• noting that the district court complied with Rule 11(b)(1)(G) in part because “the district court confirmed that [the defendant] had read and understood the indictment and had discussed all the counts with his attorney”
• noting “even a summary of the charges in the indictment and an admission by the defendant” may be “sufficient to establish a factual basis” (internal quotations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).