Skip to main content
Third Circuit· 4/12/2011

United States v. Pendleton

Citations

  • 636 F.3d 78
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 7439
  • 2011 WL 1366382

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “Pendleton’s federal duty to register under SORNA was not dependent upon his duty to register under Delaware law”
  • holding that “§ 16913 is a law made in pursuance of the constitution because it is necessary and proper for carrying into execution Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)
  • “Put simply, [the sex offender’s] duty to register under SORNA was not dependent upon his duty to register under [state] law.”
  • “[Defendant’s] federal duty to register under SORNA was not dependent upon his duty to register under [state] law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rendell, Barry, Chagares

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.