United States v. Carel, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \at oral argument [defense] counsel stated that his challenge ... is an as-applied challenge” and \Counsel for the Government agreed”
• noting that “at oral argument [defense] counsel stated that his challenge . . . is an as-applied challenge” and “Counsel for the Government agreed”
• noting that “at oral argument [defense] counsel stated that his challenge . . . is an as-applied challenge” and “Counsel for the Government agreed”
• suggesting that Raich is a Necessary and Proper Clause case
• upholding the constitutionality of § 16913 “[b]ased on Con- gress’s authority to enact [defendant’s federal] statute of con- viction” and the Necessary and Proper Clause
• “An appellant may challenge the constitutionality of a statute by asserting a facial challenge, an as-applied challenge, or both.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).