Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 2/24/2017

United States v. Anthony Ross

Citations

  • 848 F.3d 1129
  • 2017 WL 728040
  • 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 3350

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing criminal defendant’s motion to dismiss an indictment on the ground that the government’s prosecution was “defective” under the APA
  • “Where a statute grants an agency discretion but the agency erroneously believes it is bound to a specific decision, we can’t uphold the result as an exercise of the discretion that the agency disavows.”
  • “Where a statute grants an agency discretion but the agency erro- neously believes it is bound to a specific decision, we [cannot] uphold the result as an exercise of the discretion that the agency disavows.”
  • “Agencies can certainly rely on alternative rationales . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Millett, Pillard, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.