Skip to main content
Third Circuit· 9/7/2011

United States v. Pendleton

Citations

  • 658 F.3d 299
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18565
  • 2011 WL 3907120

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding Section 2423(c) because it expressly requires that an individual travel in foreign commerce before engaging in the proscribed conduct
  • using the Lopez framework in concluding that the Foreign Commerce Clause gives Congress the power to enact § 2423(c)
  • using the Lopez framework in concluding that the Foreign Commerce Clause gives Congress the power to enact § 2423(c)
  • declining to decide whether the Foreign Commerce Clause conveys constitutional authority that is broader than the Interstate Commerce Clause absent guidance from the Supreme Court
  • finding \ Lopez 's 'time-tested' framework\ suitable for the foreign commerce context
  • finding “Lopez’s ‘time- tested’ framework” suitable for the foreign commerce context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sloviter, Hardiman, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Pendleton

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.