· 9/7/2011
United States v. Pendleton
Citations
- 658 F.3d 299
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18565
- 2011 WL 3907120
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding Section 2423(c) because it expressly requires that an individual travel in foreign commerce before engaging in the proscribed conduct
- using the Lopez framework in concluding that the Foreign Commerce Clause gives Congress the power to enact § 2423(c)
- using the Lopez framework in concluding that the Foreign Commerce Clause gives Congress the power to enact § 2423(c)
- declining to decide whether the Foreign Commerce Clause conveys constitutional authority that is broader than the Interstate Commerce Clause absent guidance from the Supreme Court
- finding \ Lopez 's 'time-tested' framework\ suitable for the foreign commerce context
- finding “Lopez’s ‘time- tested’ framework” suitable for the foreign commerce context
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sloviter, Hardiman, Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.