United States v. Paul Michael Mitchell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prosecution’s appeal to improper legal theory during closing argument constitutes prejudicial plain error
• holding that prosecution’s appeal to improper legal theory during closing argument constitutes prejudicial plain error
• holding that prosecutor’s appeal to improper legal theory during closing argument constituted plain error
• holding that prosecutor’s appeal to improper legal theory during closing argument constituted plain error
• holding that prosecutor’s appeal to improper legal theory during closing argument constituted plain error
• finding that the prosecution introduced sufficient evidence other than the improper remarks to support a conviction, but nevertheless finding prejudice requiring reversal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).