United States v. Carlos Sanchez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the traditional rule that polygraph evidence is never admissible to impeach the credibility of a witness “is binding upon us in this case” (emphasis added)
• holding that the traditional rule that polygraph evidence is never admissible to impeach the credibility of a witness \ is binding upon us in this case\ (emphasis added)
• holding that not-guilty plea puts intent at issue, and evidence of similar prior crimes may be relevant to prove intent in charged crime
• holding that a not-guilty plea places defendant’s intent at issue, and evidence of similar prior crimes can thus be relevant to prove intent to commit charged crime
• holding that the traditional rule that polygraph evidence is never admissible to impeach the credibility of a witness \is binding upon us in this case\ (emphasis added)
• holding that a not-guilty plea places defendant’s intent at issue and that evidence of similar prior crimes can thus be relevant to prove intent to commit charged crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).