United States v. Ricardo U. Alerre, United States of America v. Deborah Bordeaux, United States of America v. Michael D. Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the jury was correctly instructed on the applicable legal principles,” and, that the jury was instructed that the defendant-doctors “could not be convicted if they had dispensed the controlled substances at issue ‘in good faith’ ”
• “evidence that a physician’s performance has consistently departed from accepted professional standards .... may properly be relevant to establish that the physician contravened the criminal standard of liability”
• \[E]vidence that a physi- cian consistently failed to follow generally recognized procedures tends to show that in prescribing drugs he was not acting as a healer but as a seller of wares.\
• setting forth the standard for medical malpractice in South Carolina
• “[T]he prosecution was not required to prove that the defendants 11 USCA4 Appeal: 23-1281 Doc: 57 Filed: 03/15/2024 Pg: 12 of 17 had committed . . . money laundering in order to convict them of conspiring to do so.”
• setting forth the standard for medical malpractice in South Carolina

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).