Fourth Circuit· 3/21/2006
United States v. Smith
Citations
- 441 F.3d 254
- 2006 WL 697529
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to correct error where evidence of drug quantity was overwhelming and uncontroverted
- “Evidence is necessary, even if it does not relate to an element of a charged offense, when it furnishes part of the context of the crime.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- applying Cotton principles to Booker claim on plain error review
- applying Cotton principles to Booker claim on plain error review
- apply- ing Rule 28 in criminal case
- applying Rule 28(a)(9)(A) on criminal appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilkins, Luttig, Dever, Eastern
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Daniel MathisFourth Circuit· 2019-07-31· cited 334×
- United States v. Donathan Wayne HaddenFourth Circuit· 2007-02-07· cited 291×
- United States v. FosterFourth Circuit· 2007-11-13· cited 214×
- United States v. Mohammad HassanFourth Circuit· 2014-02-04· cited 184×
- United States v. Jorge CornellFourth Circuit· 2015-03-16· cited 103×
- United States v. BynumFourth Circuit· 2010-05-05· cited 100×
- United States v. ByersFourth Circuit· 2011-05-06· cited 92×
- United States v. Hassan AliFourth Circuit· 2021-03-19· cited 86×
- United States v. WashingtonTenth Circuit· 2011-08-09· cited 51×
- United States v. Owen Robinson, A/K/A Heavy, United States of America v. Kendall Schuyler, A/K/A Sleepy, United States of America v. William M. ParrosFourth Circuit· 2006-08-09· cited 48×
- United States v. Frank WilliamsFourth Circuit· 2006-08-21· cited 40×
- People v. MeconiMichigan Court of Appeals· 2008-01-24· cited 32×
- United States v. James DentonFourth Circuit· 2019-11-25· cited 27×
- United States v. Megan MostellerFourth Circuit· 2014-02-04· cited 6×
- State v. GuzmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2022-11-16· cited 5×
- United States v. Hysen SherifiFourth Circuit· 2024-07-09· cited 3×
- Unnamed caseFourth Circuit· 2006-03-21· cited 1×
- United States v. AyalaW.D. Virginia· 2007-01-07· cited 1×
- United States v. WilliamsFourth Circuit· 2006-08-21
- United States v. RobinsonFourth Circuit· 2006-08-09
Cites
64 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court· 2004-10-01· cited 23,210×
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 16,571×
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-05-12· cited 4,572×
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court· 2002-05-20· cited 3,303×
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1974-10-15· cited 2,897×
- Edwards v. City of GoldsboroFourth Circuit· 1999-05-14· cited 2,842×
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1978-02-21· cited 2,314×
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court· 1982-05-24· cited 2,097×
- United States v. MaresFifth Circuit· 2005-03-04· cited 1,982×
- United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineNinth Circuit· 2005-06-01· cited 1,497×
- United States v. RodriguezEleventh Circuit· 2005-02-04· cited 1,324×
- United States v. David C. Hughes, the Office of the Federal Public Defender, Amicus SupportingFourth Circuit· 2005-03-16· cited 1,270×
- United States v. Louis F. PiraniEighth Circuit· 2005-04-29· cited 941×
- United States v. Roland Demingo Queen, A/K/A MingoFourth Circuit· 1997-12-29· cited 422×
- United States v. David Lee OliverSixth Circuit· 2005-02-02· cited 416×
- United States v. Anthony Gerald White, Sr.Fourth Circuit· 2005-04-26· cited 411×
- United States v. Marion Promise, A/K/A Mario,defendant-AppellantFourth Circuit· 2001-07-17· cited 343×
- United States v. DazeyTenth Circuit· 2005-04-13· cited 323×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.