United States v. Norvell Webster Crump

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In accordance with the views of all the circuits considering the question, we hold that a defendant’s conviction under § 924(c)(1
• \[It] is our view that the movement of a firearm beyond the boundaries of its state of manufacture 'substantially affects' interstate commerce[.]\
• “a defendant’s conviction under § 924(c)(1) doesn’t depend on his being convicted – either previously or contemporaneously – of the predicate offense, as long as all of the elements of that offense are proved and found beyond a reasonable doubt”
• “a defendant’s conviction under § 924(c)(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).