Sixth Circuit· 2/9/2012

United States v. Patrick John Corp.

Citations

668 F.3d 379
2012 WL 399229
2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 2510

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that defendant’s Commerce Clause claim does not constitute a challenge to the district court’s jurisdiction
explaining that the defendant’s unconditional guilty plea waived appellate review of his Commerce Clause challenge
deeming argument forfeited where party did not \object with that reasonable degree of specificity which would have adequately apprised the trial court of the true basis for his objection\ (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
“[Wjhether a particular image can be classified as portraying sadistic or masochistic conduct under § 2G2.1(b)(4) is an objective determination.”
“Generally, a voluntary and unconditional guilty plea ‘bars any subsequent non-jurisdictional attack on the conviction.’”
“The mere fact that a defendant cites other cases in which courts determined certain defendants to be deserving of different sentences does not demonstrate abuse of discretion in the instant case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Griffin, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.