United States v. Ian Owens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the vehicle was merely idling, officers thought the car was going to stop, officers were safely on the side of the car but continued walking to the front of the car and stopped in front of the car
• finding that the plaintiff did not establish municipal liability for failure to train because the plaintiff did not demonstrate “some evidence of a pattern of improper training” or “show that [the city] was aware of the deficiencies in [its] program”
• “[T]he plaintiff must demonstrate the municipality’s policy or custom was the ‘moving force’ behind the alleged constitutional violation.”
• “[W]e ask two questions: (1) whether the facts that a plaintiff has alleged or shown make out a violation of a constitutional right, and (2
• “[W]e ask two questions: (1) whether the facts that a plaintiff has alleged or shown make out a violation of a constitutional right, and (2
• “[W]e ask two questions: (1) whether the facts that a plaintiff has alleged or shown make out a violation of a constitutional right, and (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).