Skip to main content
· 8/1/1991

United States v. Keith Pickett

Citations

  • 941 F.2d 411
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 17255

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there exists an \affirmative duty on the defendant to preserve all potential collateral challenges through the preservation mechanism of Rule 11(a)(2)\
  • holding that Speedy Trial Act violations are waivable
  • addressing district court's denial of motion to compel discovery because defendants had preserved the issue in their conditional guilty pleas
  • applying this reasoning to the different treatment of crack and powder cocaine
  • finding jurisdiction over the entire appeal where the notice of appeal stated that the defendant appealed “from the final judgment” but also stated that the appeal “is based on the trial ' court’s application of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines”
  • addressing the sentencing challenges of No. 04-6428 United States v. Martin Page 5 a defendant who failed to raise the issues below where “[b]oth parties have extensively briefed the issues at stake, and . . . the issues are wholly legal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Krupansky, Boggs, Woods

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.