United States v. Geerken

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding Rule 32 satisfied where the court “viewed a representative sample of the images” and the defendant “produced no evidence to challenge the correctness of the factual findings of either the probation officer or the district court”
• no clear error in applying sadistic image enhancement for images depicting “children engaged in bondage and bestiality”
• “When a defendant fails to produce any evidence to contradict the facts set forth in the PSR, a district court is entitled to rely on those facts when sentencing the defendant.”
• “When a defendant fails to produce any evidence to contradict the facts set forth in the [PSI], a district court is entitled to rely on those facts when sentencing the defendant.”
• “When a defendant fails to produce any evidence to contradict the facts set forth in the PSR, a district court is entitled to rely on those facts when sentencing the defendant.”
• “When a defendant fails to produce any evidence to contradict the facts set forth in the PSR, a district court is entitled to rely on those facts when sentencing the defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).