United States v. Palega

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that “[w]hile some of the information provided in the warrant affidavit was more than two years old, there was also information as recent as five days prior to the warrant application,” and concluding that “when taken as a whole, the information is not stale”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).