· 8/14/2009
United States v. Stults
Citations
- 575 F.3d 834
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 18130
- 2009 WL 2476695
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a “special condition barring Internet access unless approved by the probation office is sufficiently tailored . . .”
- affirming such a condition for a defendant who was convicted of possession of child pornography and who had previously been convicted of attempted sexual assault of a minor
- upholding a sentence where the district court made an individualized assessment of the facts and addressed the defendant’s proffered information in considering the § 3553(a) factors
- upholding a special condition that prohibits the defendant \from using or having access to any electronic media that has [Ijnternet service or photography capability without express permission from United States Probation Office” or \for purposes of his employment”
- finding probable cause based, in part, on an investigator’s experience in child-pornography cases
- considering the affiant’s training in evaluating the sufficiency of a search warrant application
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Riley, Smith, Colloton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.