Skip to main content
· 8/14/2009

United States v. Stults

Citations

  • 575 F.3d 834
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 18130
  • 2009 WL 2476695

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a “special condition barring Internet access unless approved by the probation office is sufficiently tailored . . .”
  • affirming such a condition for a defendant who was convicted of possession of child pornography and who had previously been convicted of attempted sexual assault of a minor
  • upholding a sentence where the district court made an individualized assessment of the facts and addressed the defendant’s proffered information in considering the § 3553(a) factors
  • upholding a special condition that prohibits the defendant \from using or having access to any electronic media that has [Ijnternet service or photography capability without express permission from United States Probation Office” or \for purposes of his employment”
  • finding probable cause based, in part, on an investigator’s experience in child-pornography cases
  • considering the affiant’s training in evaluating the sufficiency of a search warrant application

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Smith, Colloton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.