E.D. Missouri· 8/17/2010
Green v. Missouri
Citations
- 734 F. Supp. 2d 814
- 2010 WL 3270126
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- granting summary judgment on Section 1981 claim for the same reasons as Equal Protection claim
- “As a general rule, courts will not consider arguments raised for the first time in a reply.”
- “As a general rule, courts will not consider arguments raised for the first time in a reply.”
- dismissal for failure to prosecute when defendant failed to answer, and plaintiff never moved for entry of default or default judgment
- “Official immunity does not apply to discretionary acts done in bad faith or with malice.”
- “As a general rule, courts will not consider arguments raised for the first time in a reply.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rodney W. Sippel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Coggins v. County of NassauE.D. New York· 2017-05-26· cited 20×
- Jennifer L. DeCook, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. Olmsted Medical Center, Inc., Brenda J. Hanson, R.N., and Darlene M. Pratt, R.N., Appellants/Cross-Respondents, Kenneth M. Palmer, M.D., Jack F. Perrone, M.D., Kimberly McKeon, M.D., and Ashley Morrow, R.N.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-02-17· cited 11×
- Petro v. Town of West Warwick ex rel. MooreD. Rhode Island· 2012-09-07· cited 7×
- State v. HillMissouri Court of Appeals· 2016-08-30· cited 2×
- Bell v. NeukirchE.D. Missouri· 2019-03-21· cited 2×
Cites
79 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court· 1978-06-06· cited 41,449×
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 16,485×
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court· 1970-06-01· cited 15,427×
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 14,398×
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court· 2009-01-21· cited 13,928×
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court· 1976-03-02· cited 7,274×
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-05-15· cited 7,105×
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court· 1998-05-26· cited 6,212×
- Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court· 1986-03-04· cited 6,155×
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 6,013×
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court· 1964-11-23· cited 5,133×
- United States v. WatsonSupreme Court· 1975-10-06· cited 2,263×
- Wilkins v. GaddySupreme Court· 2010-02-22· cited 2,173×
- Jett v. Dallas Independent School DistrictSupreme Court· 1989-06-22· cited 2,093×
- Devenpeck v. AlfordSupreme Court· 2004-12-13· cited 1,825×
- Brendlin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 2007-06-18· cited 1,523×
- Atwater v. City of Lago VistaSupreme Court· 2001-04-24· cited 1,388×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.