United States v. Michael Gerald Gamboa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding convictions sufficient where each offense under § 924(c) was charged under separate counts
• determining that the district court gave an inadequate ends-of-justice explanation
• distinguishing Groh on the basis that the affidavit in Gamboa was sufficiently incorporated, whereas it was not in Groh
• basing holding on the view that the machinegun provision was a sentencing factor
• “[I]mplicit in a finding that [a defendant] ‘used and carried’ firearms lies a finding that [the defendant] simultaneously ‘possessed’ the firearms....”
• “[T]he language ‘in furtherance of’ requires a slightly higher standard of participation than the language ‘during and in relation to.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).