United States v. Leland Richard Vinton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that in reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, this court “will reverse only if the jury must have had a reasonable doubt about an essential element of the crime”
• “This [sufficiency] argument was preserved by [the defendant’s] motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of the government’s case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).