United States v. Nancy Jacques

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Truscello, Asuncion-Pimental, and Thomas to condition of probation included in judgment but not stated at sentencing
• “Because these conditions were ordered in accordance with the Guidelines’ recommendations, ... their inclusion in the written judgment presents no conflict with the oral sentence and is permissible.”
• “[I]t is not reversible error for a 15 sentencing court to impose . . . conditions without mentioning them orally at 16 sentencing where the challenged conditions clarify, rather than conflict with, the 17 sentence imposed orally.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).