Skip to main content
· 9/3/1997

United States v. Milton Gottesman

Citations

  • 122 F.3d 150
  • 80 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6458
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 23030
  • 1997 WL 538009

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]t would seem self-evident that for a court to order restitution ... the plea agreement might be expected to mention the word ‘restitution.’ ”
  • “‘Federal courts have no inherent power to order restitution. Such authority must be conferred by Congress through statute.’” (quoting United States v. Helmsley, 941 F.2d 71, 101 (2d Cir. 1991))
  • plea agreement stating that defendant “will pay past taxes due and owing ... on such terms and conditions as will be agreed upon between [defendant] and the IRS” did not authorize court to order restitution
  • construing ambiguous plea agreement against the government

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walker, McLaughlin, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.