Skip to main content
· 4/23/1999

United States v. David E. Kinlock

Citations

  • 174 F.3d 297
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 7899
  • 1999 WL 239087

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that \there must be an affirmative act or statement allowing an inference that the district court in fact considered the defendant's ability to pay\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leval, Pooler, Curtin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.