United States v. Torres-Aguilar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that failing to provide legal or factual analysis of an issue constitutes forfeiture of that issue
• stating that brief mention of an argument in a footnote without legal or factual analysis constitutes waiver of an issue
• explaining an ambiguity between oral and written sentences \can be clarified by viewing the written record\
• abandoned argument was “only briefly mention[ed] it in a footnote of [the] opening brief without providing any legal citation or analysis”
• when oral sentence and written judgment conflict, oral sentence controls

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).