Skip to main content
· 1/22/1999

United States v. Dominick Truscello John Gammarano Salvatore Lombardi Barry Nichilo Gaetano Vastola Manny Garafolo Steven Long, Steven Crea

Citations

  • 168 F.3d 61
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 1044
  • 1999 WL 24932

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no error in the subsequent writtén judgment' because it did not change the sentence as stated orally
  • finding no conflict between an oral sentence in which the court stated that it would later impose supervised release conditions and the written judgment that contained standard conditions
  • finding no error in the subsequent written judgment because it did not change the sentence as stated orally
  • finding no conflict between an oral sentence in which the court stated that it would later impose supervised- release conditions and the written judgment that contained standard conditions
  • finding the written judgment simply clarified the meaning of the oral sentence
  • “Implicit in the very nature of supervised release is that certain conditions are necessary to effect its purpose.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kearse, Casey, Pollack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.