· 1/22/1999
United States v. Dominick Truscello John Gammarano Salvatore Lombardi Barry Nichilo Gaetano Vastola Manny Garafolo Steven Long, Steven Crea
Citations
- 168 F.3d 61
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 1044
- 1999 WL 24932
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no error in the subsequent writtén judgment' because it did not change the sentence as stated orally
- finding no conflict between an oral sentence in which the court stated that it would later impose supervised release conditions and the written judgment that contained standard conditions
- finding no error in the subsequent written judgment because it did not change the sentence as stated orally
- finding no conflict between an oral sentence in which the court stated that it would later impose supervised- release conditions and the written judgment that contained standard conditions
- finding the written judgment simply clarified the meaning of the oral sentence
- “Implicit in the very nature of supervised release is that certain conditions are necessary to effect its purpose.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kearse, Casey, Pollack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.