United States v. Murphy-Cordero

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that judge’s reasoning “can often be inferred by comparing what was argued by the parties or contained in the presentence report with what the judge did” (quoting United States v. Dávila-González, 595 F.3d 42, 48 (1st Cir. 2010))
• “[A] within-the-range sentence typically requires a less elaborate explanation than a variant sentence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).