United States v. Lozada-Aponte

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that sentencing judge’s discussion of “incidence of crime in Puerto Rico” was a “permissible [sentencing] consideration”
• noting that sentencing judge's discussion of \incidence of crime in Puerto Rico\ was a \permissible [sentencing] consideration\
• suggesting that a sentencing judge's failure to mention facts advanced by a party suggests that the facts were \unconvincing\
• referring to “Lozada’s frequent run-ins ■with law enforcement in Florida, Illinois, and Puerto Rico, some of which apparently involved firearms”
• noting in dictum that sentencing judge’s discussion of “incidence of crime in Puerto Rico” was a “permissible [sentencing] consideration[ ]”
• referring to “Lozada’s frequent run-ins with law enforcement in Florida, Illinois, and Puerto Rico, some of which apparently involved firearms”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).