United States v. Rivera-Gonzalez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a \dramatic -- 25–year -- upwards variance from the guidelines sentence\ where \no explanation\ could be \inferred from the record\ was plain error
• vacating a 360-month sentence where the GSR was 60 months and the court gave \no explanation\ for the variance
• rejecting same argument as contrary to our case law
• setting out the plain-error standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).