Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 1/25/2008

United States v. M.R.M.

Citations

  • 513 F.3d 866
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 1415
  • 2008 WL 199829

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Nothing in the statute precludes the district courts from giving due consideration . . . to protection of the public or deterrence.\
  • court enjoys broad discretion in sentencing juveniles under Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act
  • this court has jurisdiction to determine whether sentence imposed under Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act was imposed in violation of law or is plain ly unreasonable; district court enjoys broader discretion when sentencing juvenile offender than when sentencing adult
  • joining our circuit in rejecting a least-restrictive disposition requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Arnold, Colloton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. M.R.M.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.