United States v. Schlosser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Congress imposed “no limitation . . . on the information concerning the background, character, and conduct of a person -2- that a court may consider for the purpose of imposing an appropriate sentence” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• rejecting the argument that the district court procedurally erred in relying on a police report in sentencing in part because the report was “detailed and convincing”
• finding no plain error where district court relied on police incident report during sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).