United States v. Jonathan Silva

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that policy statements of Chapter 7, which provide the recommended ranges of imprisonment applicable upon revocation, are “merely advisory and not binding”
• holding that the sentencing court fulfilled the requirement “when it noted that a sentence above the guidelines range was necessary to respond to [the defendant’s] numerous probation violations”
• finding that an upward variance was warranted in part based on the defendant’s numerous probation violations
• finding that an upward variance was warranted based on the defendant’s numerous probation violations
• finding that an upward variance was warranted based on the defendant’s numerous probation violations
• explaining that a different section of the FJDA governing juvenile probation orders, 18 U.S.C. § 5037(b), applies 18 U.S.C. § 3565, which in turn directs the court to consider the factors set forth in § 3553(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).