· 10/27/2006
United States v. Robert E. Maloney
Citations
- 466 F.3d 663
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 26792
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing the issue in the context of variances under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)
- “A jury might have drawn [the defendant’s proffered] inference, but the presence of one possible ‘innocent’ explanation for the government’s evidence does not preclude a reasonable jury from rejecting the exculpatory hypothesis in favor of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.-”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Loken, Melloy, Colloton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.