Skip to main content
· 10/27/2006

United States v. Robert E. Maloney

Citations

  • 466 F.3d 663
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 26792

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing the issue in the context of variances under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)
  • “A jury might have drawn [the defendant’s proffered] inference, but the presence of one possible ‘innocent’ explanation for the government’s evidence does not preclude a reasonable jury from rejecting the exculpatory hypothesis in favor of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.-”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Melloy, Colloton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.