Skip to main content
First Circuit· 2/19/2004

United States v. Patrick V.

Citations

  • 359 F.3d 3
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 2796
  • 2004 WL 307043

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an ALJ may discredit physicians’ opinions 10 that are “unsupported by the record as a whole . . . or by objective medical 11 findings”
  • “When the evidence before the ALJ is subject to more than one rational 11 interpretation, [the Court] must defer to the ALJ’s conclusion.”
  • “When the evidence before the ALJ is subject to more than 8 one rational interpretation, [the Court] must defer to the ALJ’s conclusion.”
  • “When the evidence before the ALJ is subject to more than 13 one rational interpretation, [the Court] must defer to the ALJ’s conclusion.”
  • “When the evidence before the ALJ is subject to more than 10 one rational interpretation, [the Court] must defer to the ALJ’s conclusion.”
  • “[A]n ALJ may discredit treating physicians’ opinions that 11 are conclusory, brief, and unsupported by the record as a whole”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Coffin, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Patrick V.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.