· 11/25/2009
United States v. Mohsen
Citations
- 587 F.3d 1028
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 25849
- 2009 WL 4067632
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \We never suggested that 1 all errors regarding jury communications during deliberations were subject to automatic reversal.\
- privilege did not apply where there was “no 3 evidence whatsoever” that an inmate intended to send a letter to his 4 wife where the letter had her name on top but no mailing address
- privilege did not apply where there was “no 3 evidence whatsoever” that an inmate intended to send a letter to his 4 wife where the letter had her name on top but no mailing address
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fletcher, Kleinfeld, Duffy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.