Skip to main content
· 11/25/2009

United States v. Mohsen

Citations

  • 587 F.3d 1028
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 25849
  • 2009 WL 4067632

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \We never suggested that 1 all errors regarding jury communications during deliberations were subject to automatic reversal.\
  • privilege did not apply where there was “no 3 evidence whatsoever” that an inmate intended to send a letter to his 4 wife where the letter had her name on top but no mailing address
  • privilege did not apply where there was “no 3 evidence whatsoever” that an inmate intended to send a letter to his 4 wife where the letter had her name on top but no mailing address

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fletcher, Kleinfeld, Duffy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.