Ninth Circuit· 2/12/2009

Musladin v. Lamarque

Citations

555 F.3d 830
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 2728
2009 WL 331457

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the holding in Cronic requiring automatic reversal when a defendant is denied counsel at a critical stage remains binding regardless of Satterwhite
holding that the decision not to request a limiting instruction on damaging evidence may be a strategic tactic to avoid drawing further attention to damaging testimony
stating that we must ask whether the denial of counsel had a “substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury’s verdict”
explaining that a Sixth Amendment violation occurs when there is a “complete denial of counsel”
finding defendant had a constitutional right to participate in district court's communication with the jury during deliberation
finding defendant had a constitutional right to participate in district court's communication with the jury during deliberation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reinhardt, Thompson, Berzon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

59 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Musladin v. Lamarque

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.