United States v. Julius Paul Sager

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that cumulative error requires a showing of more than one error
• holding that cumulative error requires a showing of more than one error
• noting that cumulative error requires more than one error
• remanding for resentencing when the record indicated that a fine would effect the defendant’s family, and the district court had failed to make clear whether it had considered that factor
• where defendant fails to object to district court’s alleged improper comment on the evidence, review is limited to the highly deferential standard of plain error
• “one error 11 is not cumulative error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).