United States v. Simon Rosales-Rodriguez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court’s delivery of supplemental instruction without consulting parties was harmless error because “[t]he instruction ... was not coercive and did not cause the jury to rush to judgment”
• holding that district court’s delivery of supplemental instruction without consulting par- ties was harmless error because “[t]he instruction . . . was not coercive and did not cause the jury to rush to judgment”
• noting that delivery of a supplemental jury instruction is a “critical” stage of a trial that requires a defendant’s or defense counsel’s presence
• observing that “the evidence against the defendant was overwhelming” in holding that a constitutional violation was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt
• noting that delivery of a supplemental jury instruction is a “critical” stage of a trial that requires a defen- dant’s or defense counsel’s presence
• finding that the Rule 43 “error was harmless . . . and that there is no reasonable possibility that prejudice resulted from the [defendant’s] absence” (simplified)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).