· 12/22/2010
United States v. Southern Union Company
Citations
- 630 F.3d 17
- 41 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20054
- 72 ERC (BNA) 1262
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 25982
- 2010 WL 5175181
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissing complaint that made identical allegations against more than 20 individual and organizational 26 defendants, some of whom had been dismissed, in a way that 27 created “ambiguity and uncertainty” and “unnecessarily complicate[d] the matter with superfluous pleadings”
- “[W]hen we view the facts in the light most favorable to [the 27 plaintiff], . . . his [failure to comply with an officer’s order combined with his bizarre 28 behavior] does not constitute resistance at all.”
- “[W]hen we view the facts in the light most favorable to [the 27 plaintiff], . . . his [failure to comply with an officer’s order combined with his bizarre 28 behavior] does not constitute resistance at all.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lynch, Selya, Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.