Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 12/19/1975

United States v. Michael Sidney Walk

Citations

  • 533 F.2d 417
  • 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 11377

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • oral statements not discoverable under former Rule 16(a)(1)(A), which allowed disclosure only of written and recorded statements, even though the statements were eventually summarized in written notes
  • regarding virtually identical precursor to Rule 16(a)(2)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koelsch, Sneed, Firth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.