Taglianetti v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that the Court does not require “an adversary proceeding and full disclosure for resolution of every issue raised by an electronic surveillance” and finding that, in that case, the task was not “too complex ... to rely wholly on the in camera judgment of the trial court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).