United States v. Henry C. Percevault

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that court cannot compel pretrial production of Jencks materials
• reversing order suppressing witnesses' testimony on the grounds that the Government did not produce witness statements in advance of trial despite being ordered to do so
• noting that the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500, “represents a legislative determination that access to a witness’[s] statements could be useful in impeaching a witness but was not intended to be utilized in preparation for trial”
• noting that the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500, “represents a legislative determination that access to a witness’[s] statements could be useful in impeaching a witness but was not intended to be utilized in preparation for trial”
• discussing policies behind the Jencks Act
• discussing policies behind the Jencks Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).