United States v. Norman Hoffman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing a suppression order where the discovery order exceeded the parameters of Rule 16(a)(1)(A) in that it compelled disclosure of oral statements made by the defendant not in response to interrogation
• “The plain meaning of a statute is controlling absent a clearly expressed Con- gressional intention to the contrary.” (quoting North Dakota v. United States, 460 U.S. 300, 312 (1983))
• no discussion of trial court’s reliance on inherent powers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).