Seventh Circuit· 5/27/1975
United States v. Michael S. Gardner
Citations
- 516 F.2d 334
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- construing Archer’s holding as one based on entrapment: “The essence of [Archer’s ] holding is that the defendants were not merely taking advantage of an opportunity to complete their scheme provided by the Government, and that they were not predisposed to make the telephone calls.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Castle, Swygert, Wyzanski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Robert Craig, Frank P. North, Jr., Peter v. Pappas and Jack E. WalkerSeventh Circuit· 1978-03-21· cited 119×
- United States v. Milford Burkley, (Two Cases)D.C. Circuit· 1979-03-19· cited 115×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1979-06-11· cited 110×
- United States v. Claude Harris AndrewsFifth Circuit· 1994-06-07· cited 107×
- United States v. Cleveland R. RodgersSeventh Circuit· 1985-02-01· cited 88×
- United States v. Charles Tashjian, United States of America v. James CampbellFirst Circuit· 1981-09-30· cited 73×
- United States v. Joseph J. NearySeventh Circuit· 1977-03-31· cited 72×
- United States v. George M. VerrusioSeventh Circuit· 1986-10-23· cited 67×
- United States v. Francisco J. Pacheco-OrtizFirst Circuit· 1989-11-01· cited 64×
- Phillips v. GrahamIllinois Supreme Court· 1981-09-30· cited 63×
- United States v. Arthur FeraFirst Circuit· 1980-02-28· cited 61×
- United States v. Roman SkoczenSeventh Circuit· 2005-04-20· cited 59×
- United States v. Patty McClain Joseph M. Rodriguez, Ada Eveleigh Simpson, William Clark Simpson and Mike BradshawFifth Circuit· 1977-01-24· cited 57×
- United States v. Charles T. Pabian, Ralph W. Nichols, and F. Lee ThorneEleventh Circuit· 1983-05-19· cited 53×
- United States v. BastoneSeventh Circuit· 1975-12-08· cited 52×
- United States v. Donald PodolskySeventh Circuit· 1986-07-31· cited 48×
- United States v. Samih K. Masri and Wally GhalayiniFifth Circuit· 1977-03-24· cited 42×
- United States v. James H. SmithEighth Circuit· 1977-04-05· cited 38×
- United States v. DorfmanN.D. Illinois· 1981-12-09· cited 31×
- United States v. Melvin JohnsonSeventh Circuit· 1979-09-17· cited 28×
Cites
74 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1942-02-09· cited 10,035×
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court· 1974-01-08· cited 3,415×
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-12-12· cited 2,107×
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court· 1973-04-24· cited 2,012×
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court· 1972-01-12· cited 1,930×
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1954-12-06· cited 1,280×
- Sims v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1967-01-23· cited 561×
- Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 536×
- United States v. Norman ArcherSecond Circuit· 1973-09-26· cited 262×
- United States v. Kenneth George MontosFifth Circuit· 1970-04-06· cited 238×
- Loctite Corp. v. Broadview Chemical Corp.Supreme Court· 1972-02-22· cited 208×
- United States v. Stephen KramerSecond Circuit· 1961-05-02· cited 197×
- Jack Marrin Williamson and Morris Lee Lowrey v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1963-03-05· cited 193×
- United States v. Michael Lemonakis, United States of America v. Paul EntenD.C. Circuit· 1973-10-15· cited 165×
- United States v. Winston Valdemar SpringerSeventh Circuit· 1972-05-25· cited 163×
- United States v. Donald Roy CrispSeventh Circuit· 1971-01-11· cited 156×
- Rudy Notaro v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1966-07-11· cited 138×
- United States v. Richard NielsenSeventh Circuit· 1968-04-16· cited 121×
- United States v. Richard McDanielFifth Circuit· 1972-06-15· cited 115×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.