· 11/1/1989
United States v. Francisco J. Pacheco-Ortiz
Citations
- 889 F.2d 301
- 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 16341
- 58 U.S.L.W. 2342
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing when a mailing can be considered to be “in furtherance of” a scheme or artifice to defraud
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Campbell, Per Curiam, Torruella, Woodlock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.