United States v. Michael Klopf

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that an effect on interstate or foreign commerce is an element for offenses under § 1029(a)
• indicating that an effect on interstate or foreign commerce is an element for offenses under § 1029(a)
• discussing the “sentencing package” doctrine and the need for resentencing when one of the components has been set aside
• stating that “[i]ntent to defraud [under § 1029(a)(2
• “Where the government relies on circumstantial evidence, reasonable inferences and not mere speculation, must support the jury’s verdict.” (cleaned up)
• “Where the government relies on circumstantial evidence, reasonable inferences and not mere speculation, must support the 14 jury’s verdict.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).